← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/2045/2025disposed off

X Corp v. Pankaj Chhaparwal

2025-06-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla2 pages

1-ia-2192-2025.doc jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Digitally signed by JITENDRA SHANKAR NIJASURE Date:

2025.06.10 12:04:20 +0530 JITENDRA SHANKAR NIJASURE INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2045 OF 2025 IN SUIT NO.205 OF 2024 X Corp ...Applicant / Defendant No.2 In the matter between Pankaj Chhaparwal ...Plaintiff

Versus

Vatsal Vyomesh Desai and Ors.

...Defendants ---------- Ms. Sanaea Laskari i/b. Phoenix Legal for the Plaintiff. Mr. Alankar Kirpekar with Mr. Ayush Tiwari i/b. Shekhar Bhagat for Defendant No.2.

Mr. Mihir Rathod i/b. Economic Laws Practice for Defendant No.6. ---------- CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J.

DATE : 9TH JUNE, 2025.

ORDER :

1.

By this Interim Application, the Applicant / Defendant No.2 has prayed for condonation of delay in filing written statement. 2.

The Applicant / Defendant No.2 has given the reasons 1/2

1-ia-2192-2025.doc for the delay in paragraph 3 of the Interim Application. The delay is of 26 days in filing of the Written Statement from service of Writ of Summons which was on and around 16th October, 2024. There is no objection to the relief sought for in the Interim Application. 3.

In view thereof and considering the satisfactory reason in paragraph 3 of the Interim Application for the delay in filing the Written Statement, a case is made out for condonation of delay. 4.

In view thereof, the delay of 26 days in filing of the Written Statement by the Applicant / Defendant No.2 is condoned. 5.

The Registry shall accept the filing of the Written Statement by the Applicant / Defendant No.2.

6.

Interim Application is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. [ R.I. CHAGLA J. ] 2/2