Ajit Jude Ireaneus Lobo Ca Of Claire Taylor v. Bombay Burmah Trading Corp Ltd
P12.IA.2989.2025+.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2989 OF 2025 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.2480 OF 2022 Ajit Jude Ireaneus Lobo CA of Claire Taylor .. Applicant
IN THE MATTER OF:
Hugh Charles Allen .. Deceased Ajit Jude Ireaneus Lobo CA of Claire Taylor .. Petitioner
Versus
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
.. Respondents ....................
Mr. Karan Bhosale a/w Mr. Varun Satiya and Ms. Komal Patel i/by Jadeja & Satiya, Advocates for Petitioner.
Ms. Sheetal Shah, Advocate for Respondent.
...................
CORAM
: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 09, 2026 P.C.
:
1.
Not on Board. Mentioned by way of filing praecipe dated 09.02.2026. Perused the praecipe filed for Speaking to the Minutes of order dated 12.12.2025.
2.
Heard Mr. Bhosale, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Ms. Shah, learned Advocate for Respondent.
3.
Following corrections are required to be made in the order dated 12.12.2025:-
P12.IA.2989.2025+.doc ORIGINAL ORDER CORRECTIONS REQUIRED Third sentence of paragraph No.5:- When a question is put to Mr.
Bhosale as to whether a similar objection was raised by Company at the time of issuance of Entitlement Letter to the earlier Administrator Ms. Josephine Barbara Hutchinson to enable her to reclaim the shares and accruals on 09.01.2024, he would fairly submit that the same was not raised at that time and letter dated 09.01.2024 was issued by Respondent No. 1 Company.
Third sentence of paragraph No.5:- When a question is put to Mr.
Bhosale as to whether a similar objection was raised by Company at the time of issuance of Entitlement Letter to the earlier Administrator Ms. Josephine Barbara Hutchinson to enable her to reclaim the shares and accruals on 09.01.2024, he would fairly submit that the same was not raised at that time and letter dated 09.01.2024 was issued by Respondent No. 1 Company since no cause arose to raise such objection since Josephine Barbara Hutchinson submitted all requisite documents in her own name.
In sixth and seventh sentences of paragraph No.7:- It is admitted position that Ms.
Josephine Barbara Hutchinson as also Ms. Claire Taylor are both British nationals and not citizens of India. It is also admitted position that they do not hold any bank account or Demat account or PAN in India.
In sixth and seventh sentences of paragraph No.7:- It is admitted position that Ms.
Josephine Barbara Hutchinson was a British National and Ms. Claire Taylor was a French National and not citizens of India. It is also admitted position that they Clarie Taylor did not hold any bank account or Demat account or PAN in India.
First sentence of paragraph No.9:- The KYC norms argued by Mr.
Bhosale on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 Company is the objection raised by Respondent No. 1 Company.
First sentence of paragraph No.9:- The KYC norms argued by Mr.
Bhosale on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 Company is the objection raised by Respondent No. 1 Company that the Constituted Attorney of Claire Taylor has submitted his documents for KYC of Claire Taylor.
4.
Necessary corrections be carried out in the original order and fresh copy be uploaded.
5.
Praecipe is disposed.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date:
2026.02.11 11:01:19 +0530 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT