← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/3231/2025disposed off

Gannon Dunkerley And Co Ltd v. Prism Johnson Ltd

2025-11-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale2 pages

bipin prithiani 25-ia-3231.25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3231 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 537 OF 2025 Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd.

...

Applicant

Versus

Prism Johnson Ltd.

...

Respondent ****** Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Senior Advocate, a/w Vyom Shah, Solicitor, Virendra Pereira for the Applicant, Jimish Shah and Anand Iyer i/by Divya Shah Associates for Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. Snehal Shah, Senior Advocate, a/w Mr. Aditya Mehta, Mr. Pradeep Bakhru, Mr. Kaizad Dalal, Ms. Srejeta Datta i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Respondent.

by BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2025.11.06 17:47:23 +0530 BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI ****** CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : 6th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C. :

.

When the application is called out for hearing, the learned senior counsel appearing for respondent submits that an additional affidavit in support of the interim application has been served upon the respondent recently on 4th November 2025. 2.

The respondent desires to respond to the said additional affidavit of the applicant/petitioner. The record shows that the additional affidavit of the applicant/petitioner has not been e-filed till date.

3.

In view of the above, the additional affidavit on behalf of the

bipin prithiani 25-ia-3231.25.doc applicant/petitioner shall be e-filed within one week from today. A response affidavit on behalf of the respondent shall be placed on record within two weeks from today.

4.

List the application for consideration on 5th December 2025 at 1:00 p.m.

5.

The learned senior counsel appearing for the rival parties undertake to abide by the timelines for hearing indicated in paragraph No.1 of the order dated 7th July 2025 passed by this Court (Coram: Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.).

MANISH PITALE, J.