Hansraj Pragji Warchousing Pvt Ltd v. Bombay Cycle And Motor Agency Ltd

46-S-950-2006.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION by KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Date:

2025.08.26 19:14:33 +0530 KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI SUIT NO. 950 OF 2006 Hansraj Pragji Warehousing Pvt Ltd ... Plaintiff

Versus

Bombay Cycle and Motor Agency Ltd ... Defendant WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4232 OF 2025 IN SUIT NO. 950 OF 2006 ............

Mr. Dharmesh Pandya instructed by Ashwin Pandya & Associates, Advocate for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Kanishk Varma instructed by Desai & Diwanji, Advocate for the Defendant.

............

CORAM

:

ABHAY AHUJA, J.

DATE :

26 AUGUST 2025 P.C. :

Suit No. 950 of 2006 :

1.

Although this matter has been listed for marking of the Defendant's documents, however, when the matter is called out, Mr. Varma, learned Counsel, appears for the Defendant and submits that they have newly been appointed and some time be granted to ascertain whether any evidence needs to be filed on behalf of the Defendant, in as much as in order dated 21st September 2011, it has been recorded Kanchan Dhuri 1/2

46-S-950-2006.doc that the affidavit of documents and evidence tendered by the Defendant is taken on record.

Interim Application No.4232 of 2025 :

2.

Mr. Varma also seeks some time to consider the Interim Application No. 4232 of 2025 and if necessary to file reply. 3.

Having heard the learned Counsel, this Court is of the view that some time can be granted to the Advocate for the Defendant to consider the position with regard to the evidence filed on behalf of the Defendant also as regards Interim Application. 4.

Let reply be filed within a period of two weeks, with copy to the other side. Rejoinder, be filed, within a period of two weeks thereafter, with copy to the other side.

5.

List on 14th October 2025.

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Kanchan Dhuri 2/2