← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/5750/2025disposed off

Gita Vikram Kothari And ANR v. Prabodh Jamnadas Kothari And 7 ORS

2025-12-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla2 pages

sr.10-ia-5750-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

Digitally signed by TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date:

2025.12.22 18:15:21 +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5750 OF 2025 IN SUIT NO. 694 OF 2012 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 35374 OF 2024 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 775 OF 2012 Gita Vikram Kothari & Anr.

.. Applicants

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Prabodh Jamnadas Kothari .. Plaintiff

Versus

Vikram Jamnadas Kothari & Ors.

.. Defendants Adv. Aditi Bhat a/w Adv. Gauri Joshi i/b Ganesh & Co. for the Applicants/Plaintiff.

Adv. Kazan Shroff a/w Adv. Darshit Desai i/b Markand Gandhi & Co. for Defendant Nos. 2 & 3.

CORAM: FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.

DATE: DECEMBER 22, 2025 P. C.

1.

By an Order dated 16th October, 2025 the statement of the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 14 and 15 to the effect they would take the necessary steps for cancellation of the Conveyance dated 19th March, 2024 as mentioned in Interim Application (L) No. 30760 of 2025, within six weeks from that date, was recorded.

Mansi Shelke

sr.10-ia-5750-2025.doc 2.

This matter has been kept for compliance today. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff informs the Court that they have not been yet been able to obtain cancellation of the said Conveyance as per the statement given by them on 16th October, 2025. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff requests for some more time to get the said Conveyance dated 19th March, 2024 cancelled.

3.

In these circumstances, place this matter for compliance on 6th January, 2026. It is hoped that by that time the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 14 and 15 would have got the said Conveyance cancelled. [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] Mansi Shelke