← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/5963/2025disposed off

Infinity Cars Pvt Ltd v. Sabari Jani Associates

2025-12-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

19.S.5963.2025.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5963 OF 2025 IN SUIT NO. 235 OF 2025 Infinity Cars Pvt. Ltd.

Applicant (Orig. Plaintiff)

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Infinity Cars Pvt. Ltd.

.. Plaintiff

Versus

Sabari Jani Associates and Ors.

.. Defendants ..

....................

 Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Mihir Jayakar, Kiran Padalkar and Ms. Shravani Bhogate, Advocates i/by Padlkar and Partners for Applicant / Plaintiff.

 Mr. Ashish Kamat, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Anoshok Daver, Advocate i/by Niranjan Vaghela for Defendant No.1. ....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Naik, learned Senior Advocate for Applicant / Plaintiff and Mr. Kamat, learned Senior Advocate for Defendant No.1. 2.

The lis between the parties pertains to return of security deposit of suit premises. Though Plaintiff has shifted its operation from suit premises elsewhere the handing over of the suit premises has not been effected due to security deposit not having been returned. I am of the opinion that both parties should without prejudice to their rights and contentions consider resolving the dispute regarding return of

19.S.5963.2025.doc security deposit and handing over of possession rather than litigate in Court. If required this Court can appoint a mediator to resolve the issue if desired by parties. This court expresses faith in both the learned Senior Advocates appearing for the respective parties to consider the above suggestion of the court and take steps accordingly. 3.

Stand over to 12th January 2026.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.12.18 11:02:41 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE