← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/6720/2025dismissed

Meghraj Financial Consultants Priavate Limited v. Nandlal Balkishan Sahjwani

2025-11-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date:

2025.11.18 10:57:28 +0530 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD 22.IA-6720-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6720 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3004 OF 2025 Meghraj Financial Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

....Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Nandlal Balkishan Sahjwani & Anr.

....Petitioners

Versus

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors.

....Respondents ---- Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Chirag Kamdar, Mr. Dhawal Mehta, Mr. Abinash Pradhan, Ms. Garima Agrawal, Mr. Yash Dedhia and Ms. Priyanka Mehta i/b. Wadia Ghandy and Co. for the Petitioners.

Mr. Pravin Samdani, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, Mr. Aseem Naphade, Ms. Kausar Banatwala and Mr. Yash Sheth i/b. Mr. Tushar Goradia for the Applicant. Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Joel Carlos and Advocate S.V. Tondwalkar for the Respondent - BMC. Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar i/b. Mr. Sandeep Singh for Respondent Nos.15 to 21, 25 to 27.

Mr. Avinash Shirsat, A.O., (I.C.), BMC present. ---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

DATE : 17th NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

Two Interim Applications seeking intervention, have been filed. It appears that the Petitioners are desirous of resisting the said Applications, in short, not agreeable to array the Applicants as Respondents.

Gauri Gaekwad

22.IA-6720-2025.odt 2.

Office to accept the affidavits in reply filed by the non-Applicants in the two Interim Applications. Office to also accept the affidavits in reply filed on behalf of the Respondents in the Writ Petition, as well as the affidavit in rejoinder filed by the Petitioners.

3.

In view of the above, list both the Interim Applications along with the Writ Petition, on 5th December, 2025, under the "urgent orders" category.

4.

The ad-interim order passed earlier would continue until the next date.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Gauri Gaekwad