← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/7930/2025disposed off

Paresh Kantilal Patel v. Harshad Kantilal Patel And 8 ORS.

2026-04-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain2 pages

2026:BHC-OS:9202 Sayyed 901-IA.7930.2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7930 OF 2025 IN TRUST PETITION NO.5 OF 2023 WITH TRUST PETITION NO.5 OF 2023 Paresh Kantilal Patel ...Applicant/Petitioner

Versus

Harshad Kantilal Patel & Ors.

...Respondents

_____________________________________________________ Mr. M. A. Bhatkar a/w Harshad Sathe & Mr. Shyamsundar Patil i/by Leo Legal Attorneys for the Applicant/Petitioner Mr. A. R. Pai for Respondent Nos.1 & 5.

_____________________________________________________ CORAM :

JITENDRA JAIN, J.

DATE :

10 APRIL 2026 P.C.:

1.

This application is made for restoration of Trust Petition No.5 of 2023 alongwith interim applications filed therein which came to be dismissed on 14 November 2025 for non-appearance of the petitionerapplicant. 2.

The reasons are stated in paragraphs 4 to 8 of the interim application. Briefly, reason states that there was a mistake on the part of the advocate in not noticing the listing and, therefore, the matter was not attended.

3.

The learned advocate who was to appear on that day is in the Court today and has accepted his mistake.

4.

The learned advocate for the respondent nos.1 and 5 opposes the restoration on the ground that the address of the advocate who was

Sayyed 901-IA.7930.2025.doc to appear on 14 November 2025 and the address of the new advocate is one and the same. It is his submission that the advocate is changed only for the purposes of restoration to show "sufficient cause". 5.

I have heard Mr. Bhatkar, learned advocate for the applicantpetitioner and Mr. Pai, learned advocate for respondent nos.1 and 5. 6.

Admittedly, the address of the earlier advocate and the new advocate is same. However, since the earlier advocate has acknowledged his mistake before this Court, the litigant should not suffer on that account.

7.

Reply of respondent no.1 opposing the interim application for restoration is taken on record.

8.

In view thereof, the original Trust Petition No.5 of 2023 and interim applications filed therein viz., Interim Application (L) Nos.5578 and 3420 of 2024 are restored.

9.

Interim Application is disposed of.

10.

List this Trust Petition No.5 of 2023 on 19 June 2026. [ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ] Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 10/04/2026 18:00:12