← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/161/2026dismissed as withdrawn

Sunil Kumar Agrawal v. Cidco Thrugh Its Managing Director And ORS

2026-01-07Hon'Ble The Chief Justice , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.161 OF 2026 Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Proprietor of M/s. Sunil Kumar Agrawal .. Petitioner Vs.

CIDCO, Navi Mumbai and Ors.

.. Respondents Mr. Tanveer Nizam, i/by Ms. Mariam Nizam, Advocates for the Petitioner.

Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rahul Sinha and Mr. Harshit Tyagi, Advocates, i/by DSK Legal, for the RespondentCIDCO. CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ. & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

DATE : 7TH JANUARY 2026.

[ THROUGH HYBRID HEARING ] P.C. :

Responding to an objection that two NITs could not have been clubbed together and challenged by filing a single writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to file two separate writ petitions, which, if filed, may be listed on board on 8th January 2026.

[ GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. ] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ] SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date: 2026.01.07 20:04:14 +0530 1/1 907-WP-161-2026.doc Dixit