← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/909/2026disposed off

Sidhhanath Bahu Uddeshiya Samajsevi Va Shikshan Sanstha v. Director Of Education, Pune

2026-04-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil2 pages

924-909-2026-CWP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 909 OF 2026 Sidhhanath Bahu Uddeshiya Samajsevi Va Shikshan Sanstha, Aavhe, Dist. Solapur & Anr. ... Petitioners

Versus

Director of Education & Ors.

... Respondents .............

Mr. Anant Vadgaonkar a/w Mr.H.M. Khupsare, Mr. Sagar Patil for the Petitioner.

Ms. T.J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent - State. .............

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR & PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 21st APRIL, 2026.

P. C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Vadgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners and learned AGP for the Respondent - State. 2.

By the present Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to the Notices dated 27th January 2026 and 5th February 2026 issued by Respondent No.1Director of Education. By the said Notices, the Director of Education has kept hearing with respect to the proposal to appoint an Administrator on the School, as formulated by the Uday S. Jagtap 1 of

924-909-2026-CWP=.doc Deputy Director of Education by letter dated 23rd January 2026. 3.

Thus, by the impugned Notices, only hearing has been fixed. Accordingly, no interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is warranted.

4.

The Writ Petition is disposed of No order as to costs. All contentions of all the parties are expressly kept open. [PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. ] [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Uday S. Jagtap 2 of