Riyazuddin Babu Hussain Ansari v. State Of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Urban Development Dept And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4896 OF 2026 VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Rajaram Somaru Gupta VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2026.04.21 17:40:53 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.4909 OF 2026 (Sr.No.14) Mohammed Kadar Haji V.K.

WRIT PETITION NO.4910 OF 2026 (Sr.No.15) Uma Sadashiv Patil WRIT PETITION NO.717 OF 2026 (Sr.No.76) Harshad Ambalal Patel WRIT PETITION NO.721 OF 2026 Mujeeb Mian Rais Mian Shaikh WRIT PETITION NO.719 OF 2026 Ansari Ansar Ali Ameer Ali ....1

WRIT PETITION NO.729 OF 2026 Abdul Kadar Nooji WRIT PETITION NO.724 OF 2026 Chandankumar Ramjibhai Shah WRIT PETITION NO.723 OF 2026 Mohammad Ibrahim Mehmood Miyan Mujahid and Another Petitioners WRIT PETITION NO.961 OF 2026 (Sr.No.78) Riyazuddin Babu Hussain Ansari WRIT PETITION NO.970 OF 2026 (Sr.No.79) Nazmeen Habib Khan WRIT PETITION NO.1265 OF 2026 (Sr.No.83) ....2

Shabbir Yaqoob Ghanchi WRIT PETITION NO.1270 OF 2026 Shaukat Ali Mohd. Ali Shaikh WRIT PETITION NO.1269 OF 2026 Anjana Chandrakant Igewad ****** Mr. F.N. Momin, for the Petitioners.

Ms. Tanu Bhatia, for Respondents No. 2 and 3- Corporation. Smt. M.S. Bane, AGP for Respondent-State in WP No. 4896 of 2026, WP No. 717 of 2026 and WP No. 961 of 2026.

Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP for Respondent-State in WP No. 4909 of 2026, WP No. 721 of 2026, WP No. 970 of 2026 and WP No. 1269 of 2026. Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, AGP in WP No. 4910 of 2026. Smt. P.M. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent-State in WP no. 719 of 2026. Smt. G.R. Raghuwanshi, for Respondent-State in WP no. 729 of 2026, WP No. 1265 of 2026 and WP No. 1270 of 2026.

Smt. Pooja Patil, AGP for Respondent-State in WP No. 724 of 2026. Mr. Swapnil Kamble, for Respondent-State in WP no. 723 of 2026. ******

CORAM

: MANISH PITALE AND SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

DATE : 21st APRIL, 2026 ....3

P.C. :

1.

The grievance of the petitioners in these petitions is that, their shops / galas were demolished for widening of road and that they have not been paid compensation. The State of Maharashtra and the officers of Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation have been made respondents in these petitions.

2.

In all these petitions, the petitioners have submitted representations addressed to the respondent No.2 Municipal Corporation seeking redressal of their grievance.

3.

Learned AGPs appear for respondent No. 1 - State and Ms. Bhatia, learned counsel appears on behalf of respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation and respondent No.3 i.e. the officer of the said Municipal Corporation.

4.

We find substance in the contention raised on behalf of the respondent municipal corporation that the representations moved by the petitioners in December 2025 / January 2026 can be decided within a time bound period so that the grievances of the petitioners can be addressed. 5.

In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondent No.2 to decide the representations submitted by the petitioners in ....4

accordance with law and within a period of eight weeks from today. 6.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) ....5