Ashoka Wines Prpo Anita Bansal Totlani Throu. Heero Shyamlal Madhyani v. The State Of Maharashtra Throu. The Sec Ministry Of Co-Operation And ORS

5_WP996_26.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.996 OF 2026 Ashoka Wines ...

Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra and others ...

Respondents Mr. Aayush Kedia a/w. Mr. Rajesh Ranglani and Mr. Deepam Upadhyay for Petitioner.

Mr. S. L. Babar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2-State. CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 27, 2026 P.C. :

.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that although a revision application bearing Revision Application No.44 of 2026 along with an application for stay is filed and pending before respondent No.1, against an order dated 24.12.2025 passed by the respondent No.2 - Divisional Joint Registrar in an appeal, till date, neither the said revision application is taken up for consideration nor the stay application. This is causing prejudice to the petitioner as there is every likelihood of recovery proceedings being undertaken even during the pendency of the said revision application and the application for stay before the respondent No.1 (revisional authority).

2.

We are of the opinion that although the revision applications filed prior to the application filed by the petitioner would be pending before MINAL SANDIP PARAB by MINAL SANDIP PARAB Date:

2026.04.28 10:59:52 +0530 the revisional authority i.e. the respondent No.1, that ought not to come in the way of the application for stay / interim relief filed by the 1/2

5_WP996_26.doc petitioner, to be taken up for consideration at the earliest possible by the revisional authority i.e. respondent No.1.

3.

It would not be appropriate for this Court in writ jurisdiction, at this stage, when the proceedings are pending before the respondent No.1 to express any opinion either way about the matter. 4.

The learned AGP represents respondent Nos.1 and 2. 5.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.1 to take up the application for interim stay / interim relief in the pending Revision Application No.44 of 2026 of the petitioner, for consideration at the earliest. An endeavor shall be made to consider and dispose of the said application expeditiously and preferably within six weeks from today.

6.

To make it convenient for the parties, the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent No.1 revisional authority on Monday i.e. 04.05.2026 at 11:00 a.m.

(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Minal Parab 2/2