Sakshi Sandip Vighane v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary And ORS

32-WP-2025-2026.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2025 OF 2026 Sakshi Sandip Vighane ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and Ors

...Respondents

Mr. C.K. Bhangoji, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3-State.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

16th FEBRUARY 2026 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to tender the Additional Affidavit.

ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Leave granted. Additional Affidavit is taken on record. ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2026.02.17 10:59:18 +0530 3.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner makes a grievance that the copy of the report of Chief Executive Officer was not furnished to the Petitioner and, thus, the Petitioner was deprived of opportunity to meet the said report during the course of the proceedings before the District Collector and the Divisional Commissioner.

4.

Issue notice to the Respondents returnable on 23rd March 2026. ARS 1/2

32-WP-2025-2026.DOC 5.

Mr. Hamid Mulla, the leaned AGP, waives service of notice for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

6.

In addition to notice through Court, the Petitioner is at liberty to serve Respondent No.4 by private service and file an Affidavit of Service.

7.

Stand over to 23rd March 2026.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] ARS 2/2