← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2863/2026disposed off

Satish Patil Kalyan Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha And ANR v. The Union Of India Through Its Secretary And Other

2026-03-16Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar2 pages

2026:BHC-AUG:11859-DB p-903, 905, 906 and 908.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 WRIT PETITION NO.2858 OF 2026 Sanjivani Sevabhavi Bahuuddeshiya Society Kurinda And Ors.

VERSUS

The Union Of India Thr. Secretory Ministry Of Education Deparment ...

Mr. Santosh S. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents/State. Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ...

AND 905 WRIT PETITION NO.2860 OF 2026 Sai Vaidyakiya Pratisthan Himayatnagar

VERSUS

The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others ...

Mr. Santosh S. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondents/State.

Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ...

AND 906 WRIT PETITION NO.2861 OF 2026 Jagdamba Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha Bhandari Tanda

VERSUS

The Union Of India Thr. Secretary OF Ministry Of Education ...

Mr. Santosh S. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. M.Phule, AGP for Respondents/State.

Mr. S B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ...

AND 908 WRIT PETITION NO.2863 OF 2026 Satish Patil Kalyan Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha And Anr

VERSUS

The Union Of India Through Its Secretary And Other ...

Mr. Santosh S. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents/State. Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ...

[1]

p-903, 905, 906 and 908.odt CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 16 MARCH 2026 ORDER :- .

These are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioner/management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 2.

Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGPs waive notice for respondents/State in respective petitions. Learned Advocate Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar waives notice for respondent No.5/Zilla Parishad in all the petitions.

3.

We have heard both the sides.

4.

We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners' proposal independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if the petitioners are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to the petitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]