← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3118/2026disposed off

Abdul Aziz Dadamiya v. Shaikh Salim Abdul Latif Dadamiya And ORS

2026-06-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

Sonali Mane 69-WP-3118-2026.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3118 OF 2026 Abdul Aziz Dadamiya ... Petitioner

Versus

Shaikh Salim Abdul Latif Dadamiya And Ors.

... Respondents Adv. Soutrik Kar for Petitioner.

None for Respondents.

CORAM

: ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 16 JUNE, 2026 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2.

Petitioner challenges the order passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court dismissing the Revision Application and confirming the order passed by the Trial Court below Exhibit 26, whereby the Plaintiff's application seeking to be added as a Plaintiff in the suit has been rejected. 3.

The Court below has held that the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, are the Plaintiffs prosecuting the suit and that adding the Petitioner as a Plaintiff Digitally signed by MANE SONALI DILIP Date:

2026.06.18 18:52:47 +0530 MANE SONALI DILIP 1 / 2

Sonali Mane 69-WP-3118-2026.docx would misdirect the suit. If the Petitioner has an independent cause of action against the Respondent No.3, he would be at liberty to file such proceedings as may be available to him in law.

4.

In the above observation, the Petition is dismissed. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] 2 / 2