Rajaya Ayanur Chogale v. Nissar Ahmad Abdul Rajjak Chogale And ORS

25-WP3637-2026.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3637 OF 2026 Rajaya Ayanur Chogale

...Petitioner

Versus

Nissar Ahmad Abdul Rajjak Chogale and ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Bhavik Lalan, a/w Amisha Sahi, i/b Ajinkya Udane, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Mayank Tripathi, i/b Bhushan Walimbe, for the Respondents.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

1st APRIL, 2026 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI 2.

The challenge in this petition is to a final judgment and SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.04.04 11:30:15 +0530 decree dated 7th August, 2024, passed by the Appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal No.69/2017. The petitioner has a statutory remedy of appeal under the regime of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

3.

The petition thus stands disposed with liberty to prefer an appeal.

4.

The time spent by the petitioner in prosecuting this petition may be accounted for under Section 14 of the Limitation 1/2

25-WP3637-2026.DOC Act, in the event the question of limitation, for filing the appeal, arises.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2