Puneeta Sharma (Agrawal) v. Ravi Mukesh Agarwal

68-cwp-4237-26.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4237 OF 2026 Puneeta Sharma (Agarwal)

...Petitioner

V/s.

Ravi Mukesh Agarwal

...Respondent.

..............

Mr. Prashant Pandey a/w. Ms Vilasini B., Mr. Dinesh J. i/b Mr.Inderpal Singh Nirmale for the Petitioner. Mr. Pradyumna Agrawal (through VC) a/w. Mr. Bhushan M. Shinde i/b Pushpa Ganediwala & Co. for the Respondent. ..............

CORAM

:

N.R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

04.05.2026.

P.C. :

1.

Mentioned out of turn.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the contesting respondent. 3.

Considering the fact that the petition filed by respondenthusband before the Family Court is for divorce, the learned Family Court shall permit the petitioner-wife to file her written statement, if the same is filed within a period of four weeks from today. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, makes a statement that the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code at Exhibit-32 will be withdrawn. Statement is accepted.

Dinesh S. Sherla 1/2

68-cwp-4237-26.odt 5.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai shall endeavour to decide the petition filed by the respondent-husband for divorce as early as possible. 6.

The Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. [N.R.BORKAR, J.] Dinesh S. Sherla 2/2