Anwarali Mohammad Sharif v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Sec. Urban Dev. Dept. And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3009 OF 2026 Rizwan Ahmed Dawood Momin ...
Petitioner Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others ...
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3010 OF 2026 Shaikh Muhammad Mustaqeem Mastan ...
Petitioner Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others ...
Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.4570 OF 2026 Sudhakar Laxman Ranshur ...
Petitioner Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others ...
Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.4572 OF 2026 Momin Ahmed Pasha Abdul Qayyum ...
Petitioner Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others ...
Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.4574 OF 2026 Anwarali Mohammad Sharif ...
Petitioner Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others ...
Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.4582 OF 2026 Anees Abdul Majeed Qurashi ...
Petitioner Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others ...
Respondents --- Mr. F. N. Momin for Petitioner in all the Petitions. Ms. Tanu Bhatia for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in all the Petitions. Ms. P. M. J. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/3009/2026. MINAL SANDIP PARAB by MINAL SANDIP PARAB Date: 2026.04.17 17:34:54 +0530 1/3
Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/3010/2026. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4570/2026. Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4572/2026. Ms. Pooja Patil, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4574/2026. Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4582/2026. CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 17, 2026 P.C. :
.
The grievance of the petitioners in these petitions is that, their shops / galas were demolished for widening of road and that they have not been paid compensation. The State of Maharashtra and the officers of Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation have been made respondents in these petitions.
2.
In all these petitions, the petitioners have submitted representations addressed to the respondent No.2 Municipal Corporation seeking redressal of their grievance.
3.
Learned AGPs appear for respondent No.1 and Ms. Bhatia, learned counsel appears on behalf of respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation and respondent No.3 i.e. the officer of the said Municipal Corporation.
4.
We find substance in the contention raised on behalf of the respondent municipal corporation that the representations moved by the petitioners in December 2025 / January 2026 can be decided within a time bound period so that the grievance of the petitioners can be addressed.
5.
In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondent No.2 to decide the representations submitted by 2/3
the petitioners in accordance with law and within a period of four weeks from today.
6.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Minal Parab 3/3