Mohammed Ahmed Muniruddin Ansari v. State Of Maharashtra Thru. Secretary And ORS

bipin prithiani 4to8-wp-4747.26 & ors..doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4747 OF 2026 Mujeeb Mian Rais Mian Shaikh ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4750 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4784 OF 2026 BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2026.04.24 17:50:22 +0530 BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4793 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4803 OF 2026 ****** Mr. Hamza Khot (through V.C.) i/by Mr. Farooque Momin for the Petitioner in all Petitions.

Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. G. P., a/w Ms. Pooja Patil, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4747/2026.

Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/ 4750/2026.

Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4784/2026. Mrs. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/ 4793/2026.

Ms. M.S. Bane, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4803/2026. Mrs. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 &4-Corporation in all Petitions.

****** CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

DATE : 24th APRIL 2026 P.C. :

.

The grievance of the petitioners in these petitions is that,

bipin prithiani 4to8-wp-4747.26 & ors..doc their shops / galas were demolished for widening of road and that they have not been paid compensation. The State of Maharashtra and the officers of Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation have been made respondents in these petitions. 2.

In all these petitions, the petitioners have submitted representations addressed to the respondent No.2 Municipal Corporation seeking redressal of their grievance. 3.

Learned AGPs appear for respondent No. 1 - State and Ms. Bhatia, learned counsel appears on behalf of respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation and respondent No.3 i.e. the officer of the said Municipal Corporation.

4.

We find substance in the contention raised on behalf of the respondent municipal corporation that the representations moved by the petitioners in December 2025 / January 2026 can be decided within a time bound period so that the grievances of the petitioners can be addressed.

5.

In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondent No.2 to decide the representations submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law and within a period of eight weeks from today.

6.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)