Zahirulhaq Abdul Mobin Siddiqui v. State Of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Urban Development Dept And ORS

9 -11-wp-4804-2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4804 OF 2026 Zahirulhaq Abdul Mobin Siddiqui ...

Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Others ...

Respondents VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4809 OF 2026 (Sr.No.10) VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2026.04.27 14:51:20 +0530 Motilal Ram Govind Gaund and Others ...

Petitioners

Versus

State of Mahrashtra and Others ...

Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 4810 OF 2026 (Sr.No.11) Ramji Bhimaji Jakhariya and Others ...

Petitioners

Versus

State of Mahrashtra and Others ...

Respondents ****** Mr. Farooque Momin, for the Petitioners.

Ms. M.S. Bane, AGP for the State in WP No. 4804 of 2026. Ms. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for the State in WP No. 4809 of 2026. Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP for the State in WP No. 4810 of 2026. Ms. Tanu Bhatia, for Respondents No. 2 to 3.

******

CORAM

: MANISH PITALE AND SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

DATE : 27th APRIL, 2026 P.C. :

1.

The grievance of the petitioners in these petitions is that their shops / galas were demolished for widening of road and that they have not been paid compensation. State of Maharashtra and the officers of Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation have been made respondents in these petitions. Vishal Parekar ....1

9 -11-wp-4804-2026.doc 2.

In all these petitions, the petitioners have submitted representations addressed to the respondent No.2 Municipal Corporation seeking redressal of their grievance.

3.

Learned AGPs appear for respondent No. 1 - State and Ms. Bhatia, learned counsel appears on behalf of respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation and respondent No.3 i.e. the officer of the said Municipal Corporation.

4.

We find substance in the contention raised on behalf of the respondent municipal corporation that the representations moved by the petitioners in December 2025 / January 2026 can be decided within a time bound period so that the grievances of the petitioners can be addressed. 5.

In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondent No.2 to decide the representations submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law and within a period of eight weeks from today. 6.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Vishal Parekar ....2