Rajubai Subhash Chavan v. State Of Maharashtra Thru. Agp And ORS

Mamta Kale 14-wp-4889-2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4889 OF 2026 Rahubai Subhash Chavan

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

---- Ms Lalita Panchakshari, for the Petitioner.

Mr Madhur Surana, for Respondent No.6.

Ms P H Kantharia, for Respondent No.2/ AGRC.

Ms R M Shinde, AGP, for Respondents No.1 and 5 / State. Mr Deepak R More a/w Mr Shivram A Gawade, for Respondents No.3 and 5.

---- CORAM: M. S. Karnik & Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2026.04.22 16:27:55 +0530 R. N. Laddha, JJ.

MAMTA AMAR KALE DATED : 21 April 2026 P.C.

.

The learned Counsel for respondent No.6 assures that in so far as the petitioner's husband is concerned who has been found to be eligible in terms of his entitlement, the premises in question shall be allotted to the petitioner's husband. Since the husband is no more, obviously, the premises which are standing in the joint name of the petitioner and her husband, shall be allotted to the petitioner.

Mamta Kale 14-wp-4889-2026.doc 2.

In such view of the matter and by recording such assurance, the petition stands disposed of.

(R. N. Laddha, J.) (M. S. Karnik, J.)