Union Bank Of India v. State Of Maharashtra

bipin prithiani 9-wp-5225.26.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5225 OF 2026 Union Bank of India ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...

Respondents ****** Mr. Nainesh Amin a/w Ms. Priyam Amin i/by N. N. Amin & Co. for the Petitioner.

Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. G. P. a/w Mrs. M. S. Bane, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4-State.

BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2026.04.24 17:50:22 +0530 BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI ****** CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

DATE : 24th APRIL 2026 P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-bank (secured creditor).

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to amend the cause title, so as to add Tehsildar, PimpriChinchwad, Tal. Haveli, Dist. Pune, as respondent in this petition. 3.

In the interest of justice, leave is granted to carry out amendment. The amendment be carried out forthwith. 4.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-bank and the learned AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 4, place the petition 'for passing orders' on 28th April 2026, in the supplementary board.

(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)