Hemant Narayandas Pamnani v. Sudama Jodharam Hanswani And ANR

58-WP-5325-2026.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5325 OF 2026 Hemant Narayandas Pamnani ..Petitioner

Versus

Sudama Jodharam Hanswani & Ors

...Respondents

Mr. Omkar N. Mhasde, i/b Lakshyaved R Odhekar, for the Petitioner.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

21st APRIL 2026 ORAL ORDER:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2.

The suit has been instituted in the year 1991. Record has been destroyed in accordance with the provisions of Civil Manual. Thus at by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date:

2026.04.27 10:40:02 +0530 ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL this stage, when a period of more than 35 years has elapsed, there is no propriety in reconstructing the record and proceedings of the Application for temporary injunction when the Petitioner claimed that he had obtained certified copy of the order passed by the Trial Court. Instead, the SCS No. 347 of 1991 is required to be heard and decided expeditiously.

3.

The Petition thus stands disposed with a request to the learned Civil Judge seized with SCS No. 347 of 1991, to hear and decide the ARS 1/2

58-WP-5325-2026.DOC suit as expeditiously as possible and, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of communication of this order. 4.

Petition disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] ARS 2/2