Indira Hamal Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Through Its Authorised Representative Sayyad S Yusuf And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And ORS

42-WP5589-2026.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5589 OF 2026 Harshad Govind Meshram and anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Through its Chairman and ors.

...Respondents

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.04.30 10:40:42 +0530 Mr. Altaf Khan, for the Petitioners.

Mr. Vishwanath Patil, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - AGRC & SRA.

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, a/w Vikram Garewal and Kavita Sharma, i/b Ganesh & Co., for Respondent No.4. Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar, a/w Mustaqram Bagsaria and Dhanashree Humbarkar, i/b Wadia Ghandy and Co., for Respondent No.3.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

27th APRIL, 2026 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The challenge in this petition is to an order passed by the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee on 17th April, 2026, whereby the prayer for interim relief made by the petitioner was been declined. The AGRC has directed that the matter be listed in the usual course.

3.

The Court is informed that a majority of the occupants have vacated the premises.

1/2

42-WP5589-2026.DOC 4.

Since the challenge in this petition is to an interim order and that too in an appeal against the order passed under Sections 33 and 38 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. 5.

The AGRC is, however, requested to take up the appeal in its next sitting and hear and decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

6.

The petition stands disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2