Xxxx v. Mappleinfra Invit Investment Manager And ORS

5-wp-5610-2026.doc jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5610 OF 2026 Digitally signed by JITENDRA SHANKAR NIJASURE Date:

2026.04.28 18:44:55 +0530 JITENDRA SHANKAR NIJASURE XXXX.

...Petitioner

Versus

Maple Infra & Ors.

...Respondents

---------- Mr. Karl Tamboly, with Asim Naphade, Vilasini Balasubramanian and Victoria Gonsalves i/b Jayakar and Partner for the Petitioner. Mr. Jamshed Cama, Senior Counsel, Mr.Ankoosh Mehta, Ms. Arunima Phadke, Vidhi Mandowara i/b. CAM for Respondent No.1. Mr. Ashish Kamath, Senior Counsel, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Counsel with Shradha Achliya for Respondent No.3.

Ms. Madhavi Nalhuri and Mr. Sushan Mhatre, for Respondent No.4. Ms. Ankita Singhania, for the Respondent No.5. M.P. Thakur, AGP for State.

---------- CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA AND ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.

DATE :

27TH APRIL, 2026.

ORDER :

1.

By our Order dated 24th April, 2026, we had recorded that the Industrial Court had scheduled the matter for pronouncement of judgment on 27th April, 2026 and had made it clear that listing of the Writ Petition for ad-interim relief on that date 1/2

5-wp-5610-2026.doc will not come in the way of the Industrial Court pronouncing its judgment.

2.

It appears that the Industrial Court has not pronounced the judgment today. We again make it clear that the pendency of this Writ Petition will not come in the way of the Industrial Court pronouncing its judgment on the next adjourned date i.e. 29th April, 2026.

3.

Mr. Karl Tamboly, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that this Order will be brought to the notice of the Industrial Court. The statement is accepted.

4.

In view thereof, we place the present Writ Petition under the caption for 'directions' on 4th May, 2026 i.e. after the Industrial Court pronounces its judgment on 29th April, 2026. [ ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. ] [ R.I. CHAGLA J. ] 2/2