Umakant Shivaji Gawali v. Nashik Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Nashik And ORS

911-wp-5966-2026.doc jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5966 OF 2026 Digitally signed by JITENDRA SHANKAR NIJASURE Date:

2026.05.07 13:38:59 +0530 JITENDRA SHANKAR NIJASURE Umakant S/o. Shivaji Gawali

...Petitioner

Versus

Nashik Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Nashik & Ors.

...Respondents

---------- Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, i/b. Bajrang Solanke, for the Petitioner. Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh with Mr. Aniket Kanawade, Irvin Dsouza, Vaibhav Thorave, Aryan Deshmukh, Bhushan Deshmukh and Karishma Shinde for Respondent Nos.1 to 7.

Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for Respondent No.8 - State. ---------- CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA AND ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.

DATE :

6TH MAY, 2026 ORDER :

1.

This Petition has been filed for a direction to the concerned authorities to take action against the Respondent No.1 - Institution and colleges run by the Respondent No.1 - Institution who are charging fees to the students without approval of Fee Regulatory Authority. There are other prayers for refund the fees charged by the 1/2

911-wp-5966-2026.doc Respondent No.1 - Institution to the students without approval of the Fee Regulatory Authority.

2.

An Affidavit has been filed by the Respondent Nos.1 to 7 dated 2nd May, 2026, wherein they have stated that the fees have been charged to the students upon obtaining approval of the Fee Regulatory Authority and they have given the requisite details in support thereof. They have also annexed to the said Affidavit the approvals granted by the Fees Regulatory Authority. 3.

In view of the Affidavit which has been filed by Respondent Nos.1 to 7 dated 2nd May, 2026, the prayers in the Petition have been addressed.

4.

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

[ ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. ] [ R.I. CHAGLA J. ] 2/2