← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7287/2026disposed off

Suvarna Savata Nale v. The State Of Maharashtra Thro. The Secretary

2026-06-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'Ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe2 pages

503WP7287-26.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7287 OF 2026 Suvarna Savata Nale

...Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

_______ Mr. Saurabh Pakale i/b. Padmaja Malgaonkar, for Petitioner. Mr. Abhijeet Naik, AGP for State-Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. S. V. Gavand with P.H. Gaikwad, for Respondent Nos.4 to 7. ______

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

Digitally signed by PRASHANT VILAS RANE Date:

2026.06.11 19:52:52 +0530 PRASHANT VILAS RANE DATE:

11 JUNE 2026 P.C.

1.

Not on board, taken on board on a praecipe as moved on behalf of the petitioner.

2.

We have heard Mr. Saurabh Pakale, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhijeet Naik, learned AGP for the State and Mr. S. V. Gavand, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.4 to 7.

3.

At the outset, learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 4 to 7 states that the petitioner's objection dated 8 June 2006 (Exhibit D, page 18 to the petition) to the provisional seniority list of the teachers to be absorbed (page 16 to the petition), insofar as the applicability of the criteria, of the husband and wife to be brought together (पती पत्नी एक ́ીकरण) being applied to the petitioner, would be considered and a reasoned order would be passed in accordance with law, and P. V. Rane

503WP7287-26.DOC informed to the petitioner. We accept the submission as made by Mr. S. V. Gavand, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.4 to 7. 4.

In this view of the matter, without delving into the merit of the other contentions and keeping open all contentions of the parties, we dispose of this petition.

5.

No costs.

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) P. V. Rane