← Library
Bombay High CourtAO/358/2026dismissed

Mozam Ali Mir v. The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Thr Municipal Commissioner

2026-05-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

12. AO-358-26.odt Amberkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 358 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2836 OF 2026 WITH COURT RECEIVER'S REPORT NO. 9 OF 2026 Mozam Ali Mir Appellant (Org. Plaintiff)

Versus

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors.

..

Respondents (Org. Defendants) ....................

 Ms. Divya Parab, Advocate for Appellant ..

 Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar a/w Mr. Yash Jain, Advocates for Respondent No. 4  Mr. Aditya Mehta a/w Ms. Palak Salecha i/by M/s. Lexicon Law Partners, Advocates for Respondent No. 5  Mr. Deepak S. Bhalerao, Second Assistant to Court Receiver ...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : MAY 4, 2026 P. C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Parab, learned Advocate for Appellant; Mr. Charalwar, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 4; Mr. Mehta, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 5 and Mr. Bhalerao, Second Assistant to Court Receiver.

2.

Orders dated 26.03.2026 and 06.04.2026 stand complied with. 3.

Court Receiver's Report No. 9 of 2026 stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Court Receiver stands discharged without

12. AO-358-26.odt passing accounts, subject to payment of costs, charges and expenses within two weeks on demand.

4.

It is submitted that Architect is in the process of preparing a plan with regard to inclusion of the area of terrace as agreed upon by the parties. Once the said plan is prepared, the number of flats having the additional area as agreed upon by the parties shall be inserted into the draft PAAA.

5.

Liberty to apply Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date:

2026.05.05 10:51:27 +0530 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR