Mayur Ravindra Kamble v. District Health Officer Zilla Parishad Latur

927 CA NO. 548 OF 2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 548 OF 2026 IN FAST/10838/2025 Mayur Ravindra Kamble

VERSUS

District Health Officer Zilla Parishad Latur ...

Mr. Fayaz Khurshid Patel, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Pradeepkumar R Tandale, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. R K Ashtekar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3862 OF 2025 IN FAST/10838/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3859 OF 2025 IN FAST/10838/2025 ....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 17.01.2026 PER COURT :- APPLICATION FOR STAY This is an application seeking stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and award.

The learned advocate for the applicant / appellant submits that the entire amount as per the impugned judgment and award is deposited in this Court.

In view of the above, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' and disposed of.

(( 2 )) 927 CA NO. 548 OF 2026 APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF AMOUNT This is an application seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court pursuant to the award. Heard the learned advocates for both sides.

Learned advocates for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 strongly opposed the application.

4.

Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein and considering the arguments of both the sides, it would be proper to partly allow the application. Hence, the following order: ::ORDER::

a.

The application is partly allowed.

b.

The applicant is permitted to withdraw 50% of the amount with accrued interest thereon deposited in this Court on furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

APPLICATION FOR DELAY Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 36 days caused in filing the first appeal.

(( 3 )) 927 CA NO. 548 OF 2026 The learned Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay.

4.

Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence, the following order:

::ORDER::

a.

Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. b.

The delay of 36 days caused in filing the first appeal is hereby condoned.

FIRST APPEAL (ST) No.10838 OF 2025 Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 27.02.2026.

Learned Advocate Mr. Fayaz K. Patel waives service of notice for respondent No.1.

Learned Advocate Mr. R. K. Ashtekar waives service of notice for Respondent No.2.

[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav