Chandrakant Vithal Nagime And Another v. Waman Sopan Hanmante And Others

2026:BHC-AUG:13617 CA NO. 1480 OF 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1480 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 4641 OF 2025 Chandrakant Vithal Nagime

Versus

Waman Sopan Hanmante ...

Dr. R. R. Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant ...

CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J.

DATED : 27.03.2026 PER COURT :

1.

Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2.

The present application is filed for condonation of delay and for restoration of the Second Appeal.

3.

It is submitted that the appeal came to be dismissed on 19.03.2025 by the learned Registrar for non-removal of office objections, despite a conditional order being passed. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to inadvertence, the office objections could not be removed.

4.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed.

5.

Accordingly, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned and the Second Appeal is restored to the file, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to the learned counsel for the respondent.

( MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. ) Jhs/ 1/1