← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1581/2026disposed off

Mauzan Mohammad Isaq Sirajoddin v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2026-02-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'Ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav2 pages

2026:BHC-AUG:6832-DB CA 1581/26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1581 OF 2026 IN WP/11659/2023 MAUZAN MOHAMMAD ISAQ SIRAJODDIN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Megha Gaur h/f. Ms. Mohale Rekha Manikrao AGP for Respondents 1, 5 & 6 in WP : Mr. A.V. Lavte Advocate for Respondent 7 in WP : Mr. A.R. Tapse h/f. Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi Advocate for Respondents 3 & 4 in WP : Mr. U.B. Godse h/f. Mr. A.R. Nikam ...

CORAM

: ARUN R. PEDNEKER AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

Dated : February 13, 2026 PER COURT :- 1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the order of this Court dated 19.1.2024 the writ petition was dismissed for non removal of office objection. The learned counsel submits that when the matter was called inadvertently he was not aware of the same and there were certain office objections to be removed which he could not do so as he was not aware of the dismissal order. On being aware, he has filed the present civil application for restroration of the writ petition and also prayed to condone the delay of 674 days caused in filing the application for restoration of the writ petition.

CA 1581/26 2.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay of 674 days caused in filing the restoration application is condoned. The order of this Court dated 19.1.2024 is recalled to the extent of present petitioners. All the office objections shall be removed within four weeks from today failing which the impugned order of this Court shall stand restored automatically.

( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/