Tulshiram S/O. Bapurao Ghodke And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Dist Collector Parbhani And ORS.
2026:BHC-AUG:16463
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3405 OF 2026 IN FAST/6484/2026 TULSHIRAM S/O. BAPURAO GHODKE AND ANR.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2963 OF 2026 IN FAST/5935/2026 SHESHERAO S/O LAXMANRAO BARHATE AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
AND CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 2636 OF 2026 IN FAST/5745/2026 DINKAR S/O BHAUSAHEB WAGH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
AND CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 2637 OF 2026 IN FAST/5749/2026 NANDA D/O BHAUSAHEB WAGH @ NANDA W/O SHIVAJIRAO SAVANDKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3406 OF 2026 IN FAST/6446/2026 VASHWANATH S/O. SHRIRANGRAO NIRWAL THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPR. SUDAMATI AND ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
1/3
...
915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3427 OF 2026 IN FAST/6500/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3426 OF 2026 IN FAST/6489/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3428 OF 2026 IN FAST/6504/2026 RADHABAI W/O. KASHINATH WAGH (DEAD) THR HIS LEGAL REPR. DINKAR BHAUSAHEB WAGH AND ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3435 OF 2026 IN FAST/6439/2026 SHASHIKANT S/O. TARACHAND KALA AND ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AT PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3438 OF 2026 IN FAST/6480/2026 MADHAVRAO @ MAHADU S/O. ABASAHEB NAJAN (DIED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPR. DILIP.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3439 OF 2026 IN FAST/6437/2026 BHAGWAN S/O. BABURAO GHODKE AND ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Vitthal D. Bhise A.G.P. for Respondent/State : Mr. A.R. Kale, Addl.P.P., Mr. G.O. Wattamwar, Mr. N.R. Dayma, Mr. S.V. Hange, Mrs. P.V. Diggikar Advocate for Respondent/Acquiring Body : Mr. B.R. Surwase 2/3
CORAM
: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 16.04.2026 PER COURT :
Civil Application Nos. 2963/2026, 2636/2026 and 2637/2026 are not on board. Taken on board, on mentioning. 2.
The applicants seek to condone delay ranging between 3030 days to 6889 days in preferring appeals. It is already indicated that the main appeals would be considered finally at the admission stage. The matters are squarely covered by view taken by this Court. 3.
The applicants seek to condone delay for the reasons stated in the applications. They are ready to give up interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.
4.
The applications are contested by the respondents. 5.
The averments of the applications have not been controverted. There is no reason to infer any mala fides on the part of the applicants. They are ready to give up interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 6.
The delay stands condoned on condition that the applicants shall not entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 7.
The Civil Applications are disposed of.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 3/3