Shaikh Zaid Abdul Ahmed v. State Common Entrance Test Cell Through Its Commissioner And Competent Aurthority
2026:BHC-AUG:12138-DB {1} drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3415 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10070 OF 2022 Shaikh Zaid Abdul Ahmed APPLICANT
VERSUS
State Common Entrance Test Cell through its Commissioner and Others RESPONDENTS .......
Mr. A. V. Hon, Advocate for the Applicant Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. A. D. Sonkawade, Advocate for Respondent No.4 M4. Wasif Shaikh h/f Mr. N. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 .......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 23 rd MARCH, 2026 ORDER :
1.
This Civil Application is filed seeking direction to the College / Management to issue Hall Ticket to the Applicant. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has already lost his first paper.
2.
Learned Advocate for the College / Management submits
{2} that since last 4 years, the Applicant has not deposited a single rupee. He further submits that as on today, Rs.27,00,000/- is outstanding fees against the Applicant and Rs.3,00,000/- would be the fees for the next semester.
3.
Learned AGP appearing for the State contends that the applicant is not eligible for reimbursement of fees. 4.
Taking into consideration the urgency involved in the matter and as the applicant has already lost his first paper, at this stage, we direct the College to issue Hall Ticket to the Applicant by accepting Rs.5,00,000/- which is being deposited by the father of the Applicant.
5.
If the Applicant takes admission for the next semester, he shall deposit Rs.3,00,000/-. Of course, the amount of fees deposited by the Applicant is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Applicant and shall be subject to the final decision of the Writ Petition.
6.
With the above directions, the Civil Application is disposed of.
7.
Learned Advocate for the College / Management shall inform this order to the College / Management.
{3} 8.
Parties are permitted to act on the authenticated copy of this order.
[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/ca3415-26.doc