Subhash Dnyanoba Chaudhari. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Dist Collector Jalna And ORS.

2026:BHC-AUG:22332 65&66 CA3551.2026+ -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 65 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3551 OF 2026 IN FAST/5694/2026 RAOSAHEB S/O. BAPURAO KORDE (DIED) THR LEGAL HEIRS LAXMIBAI AND ORS.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA T/H COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS. ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Kailas B AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. Satish A. Gaikwad ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3552 OF 2026 IN FAST/5763/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3553 OF 2026 IN FAST/5765/2026 ...

AND ...

66 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3554 OF 2026 IN FAST/5704/2026 NARHARI TULSHIRAM CHAUDHARI.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Kailas B AGP for Respondents: Mr. Sandesh V. Hange ...

65&66 CA3551.2026+ -2CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.

Date : 08.06.2026 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, makes a statement across the bar that the applicants would not claim interest and statutory benefit for the delayed period. 3.

In view of the above statement and for the reasons stated in the applications for condonation of delay, delay is condoned. The Civil Applications for condonation of delay are allowed, subject to the condition that the applicants file an undertaking before this court that the applicants shall not claim interest and statutory benefit for the delayed period.

(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) marathe