Arun Balikram Ingle v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2026:BHC-AUG:13332-DB {1} ca3661-26.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3661 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11230 OF 2024 Arun Balikram Ingle APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. A. D. Sonkawade, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. S. V. Dixit, Advocate for Respondent No.4 .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 27 th MARCH, 2026 ORDER :

1.

Leave to correct the schedule.

2.

This Application is filed seeking leave to amend the Writ Petition.

3.

Learned Advocate for Respondent No.4 submits that this is a fresh cause of action, therefore, the Applicant should file a fresh petition.

4.

Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that the ground of challenge remains the same, as is mentioned in the

{2} ca3661-26.doc Writ Petition and, therefore, there is no need to file fresh writ petition.

5.

Having heard learned Advocates for the parties, we are of the opinion that the Application deserves to be allowed. 6.

In the result, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "A".

7.

Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. [ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/ca3661-26.doc