← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4320/2026disposed off

M/S Jyoti Developers Through Its Managing Partner Mukund Govind Sangvikar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secreary And Others

2026-04-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar2 pages

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4320 OF 2026 IN WP/12064/2017 M/S JYOTI DEVELOPERS THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER MUKUND GOVIND SANGVIKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1926 OF 2026 IN WP/12064/2017 NARENDRAMOHAN HARCHARANDAS MALHOTRA

VERSUS

M/S JYOTI DEVELOPERS THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER MUKUND GOVIND SANGVIKAR WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12064 OF 2017 M/S JYOTI DEVELOPERS THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER MUKUND GOVIND SANGVIKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr.S.B.Solanke, Advocate for the applicant in CA No.1926/2026. Mr.S.P.Pandav, Advocate for the applicant in other applications. Mr.S.V.Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms.K.B.Patil Bharaswadkar, Addl.G.P. for the respondent/State. ( CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. ) DATE : 16 APRIL, 2026 PER COURT :

khs/April 2026/4320

- 2 - 1.

This application is filed seeking addition of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Metropolitan Regional Development Authority, a Planning Authority as a party respondent.

2.

Considering the above, this Court find that the application needs to be allowed. The application is, therefore, allowed. The proposed respondent be added as a respondent No.4 forthwith. As there are allegations against the Planning Authority, we find that it is a necessary party. The application is therefore allowed. After adding the party, issue notice to the newly added respondent, returnable on 11.06.2026.

( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J.) khs/April 2026/4320