Kishan S/O. Rambhau Khedekar. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Dist Collector Parbhani And ORS.

1 53 to 62 ca 4376.26.26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4376 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 8945 OF 2026 Kishan S/o. Rambhau Khedekar 54 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4377 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9002 OF 2026 Narayan Nivratti Satpute and another 55 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4378 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9005 OF 2026 Ramchandra Balabhau Gingine and others.. Applicants 56 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4379 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9368 OF 2026 Ganesh Baburao Wagh and others

2 53 to 62 ca 4376.26.26 Collector, Jalna and others 57 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4380 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9179 OF 2026 Bhagwan Vitthalrao Nirwal 58 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4381 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9362 OF 2026 Shaikh Mahmood Kausar Moinuddin Collector, Jalna and others 59 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4401 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9209 OF 2026 Wamanrao Govindrao Aute 60 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4406 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9172 OF 2026 Shivaji Govindrao Aoute Since deceased through his L.Rs.

Sagarbai and others

3 53 to 62 ca 4376.26.26 61 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4407 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 8985 OF 2026 Sundar Babanrao Gadekar Since deceased through L.Rs.

Yamuna and others 62 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4408 OF 2026 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9042 OF 2026 Shrirang Damodhar Ghodke Shri Vitthal D. Bhise, Advocate for the Applicants in all matters except C. A. No. 4379 of 2026 and C. A. No. 4381 of 2026 Shri Arun H. Koralkar, Advocate for the Applicants in C. A. No. 4379 of 2026 and C. A. No. 4381 of 2026.

Shri A. R. Kale, Addl.G.P., Shri S. V. Hange, Smt. P. V. Diggikar, Shri G. O. Wattamwar, Shri N. R. Dayma and Shri C. V. Bhadane, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in respective matters.

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2026.

4 53 to 62 ca 4376.26.26 ORDER :

.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 06.05.2026. Learned A. G. P. waive notice for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in respective matters.

2.

It is informed that these matters are covered by the consistent view taken by this Court. It is made clear that an endeavour shall be made to decide the first appeals simultaneously with civil applications for condonation of delay. 3.

Applicants are permitted to serve the respondent No. 3 - acquiring body by private notice.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/April 26