Cidco Aurangabad Through Its Administrator v. Manikchand Ghisulal And ORS

2026:BHC-AUG:19923 1 42+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 42 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5267 OF 2026 IN FA/1360/2003 CIDCO AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR

VERSUS

1.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2. MANIKCHAND GHISULAL PHULPAGAR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A. S. Bajaj Advocate for the Lrs of Non-applicant No.2: Mr. P. F. Patni ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5268 OF 2026 IN FA/1360/2003 ...

WITH ...

CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 8879 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 696 OF 2004

CORAM

:

ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :

04.05.2026 PER COURT:

1.

The connected First Appeal No.696 of 2004 along with Civil Application Stamp No.8879 OF 2026 is not on board. Taken on board. The civil application filed therein to bring the legal representatives of the original claimant/s is allowed. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned, as there is no objection for the same. Abatement, if any, is set aside.

2 42+ 2.

Civil Application No.5267 of 2026 is filed for restoration of First Appeal. Three is no objection to allow the application. The First Appeal is restored by setting aside the order of the Registrar (Judicial) dated 19.11.2019. Delay of 2324 days in filing the present civil application is also condoned. The civil application stands allowed accordingly.

3.

Civil Application No.5268 of 2026 is filed to bring the legal representatives of Respondent No.1 on record. There is no objection allow the application. The present civil application is allowed. Abatement, if any, is set aside. Delay of 5639 days in filing the present civil application is also condoned. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe