← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5743/2026disposed off

Sadguru Hamal Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd Through Authorised Signatory V N Pedgulwar v. Union Of India And Others

2026-06-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar2 pages

2026:BHC-AUG:22072-DB 2-ca5743.2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5743 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5296 OF 2026 Sadguru Hamal Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.

..Applicant Vs.

Union of India and others ..Respondents ---- Mr.U.R.Awate i/b.M/s. Talekar and Associates for applicant Mr.Akshay Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent no.1 Mr.V.V.Jahagirdar, AGP for respondent nos.2 and 3 ---- CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.

DATE : JUNE 05, 2026 (Vacation Court) ORDER :- Mr.U.R.Awate, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that during pendency of the Writ Petition there is a development in the facts. He would submit that in the meantime, the respondents/authorities have disqualified the applicant/petitioner. In view of that, he submits that it has become incumbent on the part of the applicant to amend the Writ Petition so as to challenge the said disqualification and also to add the necessary parties. 2.

Although the applicant/petitioner demonstrates that the copies of the Civil Application are served to the office of the Government Pleader and the Union of India well in advance i.e. on

2-ca5743.2026 02.06.2026, Mr.Akshay Kulkarni, learned counsel for the respondent - Union of India submits that the copies are not received by his office. 3.

Mr.Awate, learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the Union of India is not a contesting party although it is arrayed as respondent no.1. He submits that it is the State authorities and particularly the respondent no.2 who is the main contesting party and predominantly answerable in the Writ Petition. 4.

Learned AGP would fairly submit that appropriate order may be passed in the Civil Application.

5.

Considering that the amendment sought to be made is about the applicant/petitioner's disqualification during pendency of this Writ Petition, I deem it appropriate to allow the Civil Application. 6.

Hence, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). The applicant/petitioner to amend the Writ Petition memo on or before the due date i.e. 10.06.2026. Copies of the amended Writ Petition compilation be served in advance to learned counsel for the respondents - Union of India and State Authorities. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] ...........

KBP