Shweta Pravin Parmar v. Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority

901-CP-265-2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 265 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2789 OF 2026 PURTI PRASAD PARAB PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2026.04.29 17:38:26 +0530 Shweta Pravin Parmar ... Petitioner

Versus

Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority and Ors.

... Respondents **** Mr. Harjot Singh Alang for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 28th APRIL, 2026 P.C. :

1.

This Petition is at a pre-notice stage.

2.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has circulated this Petition vide Motion dated 27th April, 2026 seeking leave to withdraw the Petition as the grievance is redressed. The said praecipe is marked as "X" for identification.

3.

The learned Advocate for the Corporation has tendered a copy of an order dated 23rd April, 2026 ( 9 pages). According to him this takes care of the grievance of the Petitioner. The said order is marked as "Y" for identification.

Purti Parab

901-CP-265-2026.odt 4.

In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions.

(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Purti Parab