← Library
Bombay High CourtRPW/36/2026disposed off

Aspandiar Rashid Irani And ANR v. Pasayadan Co Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd Thru. Secretary And ORS

2026-03-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar2 pages

8-rpw36-2026 in wp8045-2025 to 11.doc AGK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.36 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8045 OF 2025 WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.37 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8044 OF 2025 ATUL GANESH KULKARNI ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2026.03.11 18:43:41 +0530 WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.38 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8046 OF 2025 WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.39 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8155 OF 2025 Aspandiar Rashid Irani & Anr.

... Petitioners V/s.

Pasayadan Coop. Housing Society Limited & Others ... Respondents Mr. A.R. Gole i/by Ms. Rupali S. Akolkar for the petitioners in review petitions.

Ms. Priyanka Bhadrashete for respondent No.1 Smt. D.S. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3State in RPW/36/2026. Smt. P.J. Gavhane, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3State in RPW/37/2026. Smt. A.A. Nadkarni, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3State in RPW/38/2026. Smt. Mamta S. Shrivastava, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3-State in RPW/39/2026.

8-rpw36-2026 in wp8045-2025 to 11.doc

CORAM

: AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATED : MARCH 9, 2026 P.C.:

1.

All the grounds raised in these review petitions cannot be termed as error on the face of record. The arguments are already considered in the judgment. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the judgment, only remedy for them is to challenge it before superior Court.

2.

All the review petitions, accordingly, stands disposed of. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)