Sau. Vaishnavi Jagjivan Sabane v. Jagjivan Kisanrao Sabane
25..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (TR) NO.168 OF 2026 Vaishnavi J. Sabane Vs. Jagjivan Kisanrao Sabane Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. H. V. Dhage, Advocate for applicant.
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 12.06.2026.
.
The non-applicant - husband has refused to accept the notice issued by the applicant - wife through speed post. Service affidavit in this regard is filed on record along with the M.O. tracking report. The office has certified that notice send by Speed Post by the applicant is refused by the non-applicant - husband. 2.
The present application is filed seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition-A No.1450 of 2025 from the file of the learned Family Court, Pune to the file of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mehkar. The distance between Mehkar and Pune is around 460 kilometers. The applicant - wife has filed proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mehkar. It is also stated that father of the applicant is suffering from cancer. Having regard to the fact that a proceeding is already pending before the Court at Mehkar, the father of applicant is suffering from cancer and the distance between Mehkar to Pune is around 460
25..odt kilometers, coupled with the fact that the non-applicant - husband has refused to accept the notice and has not entered appearance to oppose the application, I am inclined to allow the present transfer application. 3.
Hindu Marriage Petition-A No.1450 of 2025 is, therefore, ordered to be transferred from the file of the learned Family Court, Pune to the file of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mehkar.
4.
In the event the non-applicant - husband makes an application for appearance through videoconferencing, the same may be considered favorably and permission to appear through video-conferencing may be granted on such dates and at such stages as is deemed appropriate by the learned Family Court.
(ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) T ...
αɳɱαყ