Uttam Singh Rajput v. Income-Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1), Panaji And 3 ORS.

36 WP 189 2026 siddhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.189 OF 2026 UTTAM SINGH RAJPUT ... PETITIONER

Versus

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), PANAJI AND 3 ORS.

... RESPONDENTS Mr. Sahil Sardessai with Ms. Rutuja N. Pawar, (Through V.C.) Advocates for the Petitioner.

Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel and Ms. Saloni Sankhe(Through V.C.), Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Pravin N. Faldessai, Deputy Solicitor General of India for the Union of India.

Mr. Raviraj Chodankar, Central Govt. Standing Counsel for Union of India.

CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES & AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, JJ.

DATED :- 28th April, 2026 P.C.

1. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Revenue has withdrawn the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.

2. Consequently, the subject matter of this petition has become infructuous.

3. On instructions, learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks to 28th April, 2026

36 WP 189 2026 withdraw this petition.

4. Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, J.

VALMIKI MENEZES, J.

Signed by: SHAKUNTALA ZALMI Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 29/04/2026 17:29:13 28th April, 2026