Gulam Jilani Almas Kagdi v. The District Caste Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Chairman, Akola And ORS.

5 caw 765-2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.765/2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 638/2026 (D) Gulam Jilani Almas Kagdi Vs.

The District Caste Scrutiny Committee, through its Chairman, Akola and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri Abdul Subhan, Advocate for applicant Ms M.S. Naik, AGP for respondents/State CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND N.S. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 30.03.2026 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.

2.

The present application is filed for speaking to the minutes. However, on perusal of the prayer, it is not clear what type of omission in the judgment is being pointed out. It is the contention of the petitioner that his right to challenge the termination order be kept open. 3.

In our considered opinion, as the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee has already been set aside by this Court vide judgment dated 09.03.2026, there is no impediment to the petitioner to challenge his termination order independently.

4.

The application is rejected.

(N.S. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) R.S. Sahare Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 30/03/2026 18:35:59