← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/1307/2026rejected

Maroti S/O. Mahadeo Jirapure v. The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal And Others

2026-05-04Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi1 pages

2026:BHC-NAG:6867 1 caf.1307.26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.1307/2026 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.119/2018 Maroti s/o. Mahadeo Jirapure Vs.

The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. B. Nakshane, Advocate for Appellant.

Ms. Mallika Babhulkar, Advocate h/f. Mr. M. A. Kadu, Advocate for Respondent No.1/Applicant.

CORAM : MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,J.

DATED : 04/05/2026.

.

The applicant/respondent No.1 has filed this application for speaking to the minutes as there is typographical mistake.

2.

Ms. Babhulkar, learned Counsel for the applicant submits that, the calculation is not correct as per the authorities cited by the respondent No.1/applicant. 3.

Perusal of the judgment, it reveals that, after considering the authorities, the compensation is granted. There is no any typographical mistake. Hence the application is rejected and disposed of accordingly. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,J) RGurnule Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 04/05/2026 19:25:15