← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/3185/2026disposed off

Amol Kashinath Gawade v. The Authorized Officer Union Bank Of India And ORS

2026-04-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat2 pages

904_IA_3185_26.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3185 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 15718 OF 2025 Amol Kashinath Gawade and another ...

Applicants/ Orig. Resp. Nos.2 & 3 In the matter between:

Anil Ankush Pawar and another ...

Petitioners vs.

The Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India and others ...

Respondents Mr. Ronak Shah (through V.C.) a/w. Mr. Viraj Shelatkar for applicants/original respondent Nos.2 and 3.

Mr. Parth Shah for petitioners.

Ms. Priyam Amin, i/b. N. N. Amin & Co. for respondent No.1 - bank. CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ DATE :

23rd APRIL, 2026 P.C. :

.

By this application, the applicants/original respondent Nos.2 and 3 are seeking extension of time for the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (DRAT) to decide Interim Application No.165 of 2026 in Regular Appeal No.8 of 2026. The application has been filed in the backdrop of the fact that in the order dated 04.03.2026 disposing of Writ Petition No.15718 of 2025, this Court had indicated that the said application be decided by the DRAT at least within two weeks of 02.04.2026.

by PRIYA KAMBLI Date:

2026.04.23 18:18:20 +0530 PRIYA KAMBLI 1/2

904_IA_3185_26.doc 2.

We are informed that the hearing on the application is partheard and in an order dated 15.04.2026, the DRAT has recorded that the parties would jointly approach this Court for extension of time for deciding the said interim application.

3.

The learned counsel for the applicants informs this Court that the Chairperson of the DRAT indicated that he may not be available for some period in the near future and therefore, extension of time may be sought, keeping that in mind.

4.

In that light, the learned counsel for the parties jointly request for extension of time by eight weeks for deciding the interim application.

5.

In view of the above, the application is disposed of by granting extension of time by eight weeks to the DRAT, for deciding Interim Application No.165 of 2026 in Regular Appeal No.8 of 2026. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Priya Kambli 2/2