Nitin Maruti Gaikwad v. Yogita Nitin Gaikwad

1/1 39 IA 3320-26.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3320 OF 2026 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.3963 OF 2026 Nitin Maruti Gaikwad ..

Applicant

Versus

Yogita Nitin Gaikwad ..

Respondent ...

Mr.Sanjay Bhojwani a/w Mr.Naresh Parihar for the Applicant. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 8th MAY, 2026 P.C:- The Interim Application seek condonation of delay of 33 days of 33 days in filing the Family Court Appeal being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17/09/2025 thereby dismissing the Restitution Petition No. 634/2019 and partly allowing the Divorce Petition NO. 683/2021. We have heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and perused the Application.

Being satisfied with the bonafides and taking note of the fact that the time consumed was on account of not being made aware of the order being passed, we condone the delay of 33 days.

Let the Registry register the First Appeal.

RAJSHREE KISHOR MORE RAJSHREE KISHOR MORE Date: 2026.05.08 16:28:26 +0530 In the wake of above, Interim Application is disposed of. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Rajshree