← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/3465/2026disposed off

Nanda Takawane And ORS v. Shri Ram Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha

2026-06-10Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'Ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande3 pages

NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2026.06.12 13:40:15 +0530 NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4926 OF 2026 Shriram Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd. ...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.12482 OF 2026 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN WRIT PETITION NO.4926 OF 2026 Nanda Takawane and Ors.

...Applicants

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:-

Shriram Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Through Recovery Officer

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

WRIT PETITION NO.5132 OF 2026 Shri Ram Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd.

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3465 OF 2026 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN WRIT PETITION NO.5132 OF 2026 Nanda Takawane and Ors.

...Applicants 1/3

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:-

Shriram Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Through Recovery Officer

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. V. P. Kakade i/b Mr. Sambhaji Jagtap for the Petitioner in both the Writ Petitions.

Ms. Darshna Naval for the Applicants/Interveners. Mr. K. S. Thorat, 'B' Panel Counsel with Mr. P. J. Gavhane, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State in WP/4926/2026.

Mr. K. S. Thorat, 'B' Panel Counsel with R. A. Salunkhe, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State in WP/5132/2026.

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 10th JUNE 2026 P.C. :

1.

In the light of the arguments advanced before us in Civil Writ Petition No.3057 of 2026 and it having being pointed out to us that interim moratorium has been imposed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), upon the State Bank of India filing an application under Section 95 against the guarantors of the Corporate Debtor, Siddheshwar Industries Private Limited, the learned counsel for the petitioner who has innocuously sought the relief of directing 2/3

the Collector/Tahsildar for execution of the order passed by the Collector, on an application filed under Section 156 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions. However, he seeks liberty to approach this Court at an appropriate stage, if an occasion for him so arises. 2.

Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives for consideration in Interim Applications being Interim Application (Stamp) No.12482 of 2026 and Interim Applicaton No.3465 of 2026. The same stand disposed of accordingly.

MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.

BHARATI DANGRE, J.

3/3