Divyangbhai Kamleshbhai Raval v. The State Of Maharashtra

111-Appln 55 of 2026.doc TIKAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 55 OF 2026 Divyangbhai Kamleshbhai Rav ...Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.04.04 11:17:15 +0530 _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Neha Blani a/w. Tahir Hussain a/w. Mr. Subhash Hulyalkar a/w. D, Advocate for Applicant.

, APP for Respondent-State.

_________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 30th MARCH, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

By this application, the Applicant is seeking relaxation of condition i.e. Applicant shall not leave the country without permission of the Court till conclusion of trial, which was granted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pune dated 09/12/2024 2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that 28 co-accused, who have been released on bail, the said condition has not been imposed on them. The said condition of taking permission to the Court to go to abroad is only imposed in the case of the Applicant and requested to allow the application.

3.

Leaned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for relaxation of condition.

111-Appln 55 of 2026.doc TIKAM 4.

I have heard both learned counsel and considering the submissions of the learned counsel as well as considering the fact that 28 co-accused who have been released on bail , the said condition of taking permission of the Court before go to abroad, has not been imposed on them, I pass the following order:

ORDER

(i) Criminal Application is allowed.

(ii) Condition No. 4 imposed on Applicant to take permission before go to abroad passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Pune dated 09/12/2024 is relaxed.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)