Samir Noormiya Killarikar v. The State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

931 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1009 OF 2026 IN APEAL/67/2024 Samir Noormiya Killarikar ..Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Another ..Respondents .....

Shri. Satej Jadhav h/f. Shri. Ajinkya Reddy, Advocate for Applicant Shri. P. K. Lakhotiya, APP for the State.

Shri. S. S. Panale, Advocate for Respondent No.2 .....

WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2024 .....

CORAM : N. B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL - JADHAV, JJ.

Dated :

APRIL 02, 2026 PER COURT :- .

Learned Advocate Shri. Satej Jadhav h/f. learned Advocate Shri. Ajinkya Reddy submits that, Advocate Shri. Ajinkya Reddy has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the Applicant / Appellant. In view thereof, appearance of learned Advocate Shri. Vishal Chavan is discharged. 2.

Learned Advocate for the Applicant / Appellant undertakes to remove office objections within one (1) week. 3.

At the oral request made by learned Advocate for the Applicant, permission is granted to add CBI as party Respondent. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

4.

Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 09.04.2026.

Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent No.1 - State and learned Advocate Shri. S. S. Panale, Spl. Public Prosecutor waives service of notice on behalf of added Respondent i.e. C.B.I. 5.

Learned Advocate for the Applicant has tendered across the bar Imprisonment Certificate. The same is taken on record and marked 'X' for the purpose of identification.

(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.) (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) GGP